Jack Lifton’s 2025 Rare Earths Year in Review — More Darwin Than Boom

,

Jack Lifton, Co-Chair of the Critical Minerals Institute (CMI), settled into his chair with a frank verdict on 2025: “Was it a good year for rare earths or not? I don’t really think so, Tracy. I think there were too many choices presented to the public and a delusion, therefore, of well-focused capital in this segment.”

Lifton’s measured skepticism contrasted sharply with the heady optimism that greeted rare earths at the start of the year, when critical minerals were being hailed as geopolitical currency and government spending surged. “Critical minerals are no longer a niche industrial concern — they’re the currency of geopolitical power,” wrote Hughes earlier in 2025.

Yet Lifton — renowned for his deep expertise and razor-sharp analysis — was unmoved by the hype. “I don’t really think there were any surprises that we didn’t already have on our radar,” he reflected. “My thought about 2025 is this: we are now entering a period of Darwinian evolution in the rare earth permanent magnet space.” In his telling, markets not only correct but select: “Nature provides continuous variation of species … the survivors are naturally selected by the environment.”

On that evolutionary note, he argued that much of the enormous policy and capital flurry amount to overcapacity. “Companies now on center stage for rare earths in North America have combined outputs of many many times this demand,” he said, pointing to an anticipated supply that far outstrips realistic market needs.

At stake, he said, was the fate of the electric vehicle boom — long a poster child for rare earth demand. “I personally believe that the age of the EV in North America is basically over,” Lifton declared. “The EV will now be just another niche product … luxury products in the North American automotive industry usually are at 5 to 8% of the total.” Without the EV growth narrative, he added, magnet demand reverts to legacy applications — motors for appliances, displays, and established industrial uses. Lifton’s critique was not merely academic; it echoed broader 2025 trends. Washington and allied capitals shifted into industrial policy overdrive, deploying billions in subsidies and supply-chain support — from US$100 billion strategic minerals commitments to new processing incentives — yet real end-market demand for rare earth magnets remained murky.

In Lifton’s view, the so-called rare earth resurgence of 2025 may ultimately be remembered not as a boom, but as a sorting process — where only the most resilient, efficient producers survive in a Darwinian marketplace increasingly divorced from easy geopolitical narratives. For more informatoin on the Critical Minerals Institute (CMI) go to criticalmineralsinstitute.com or email us at [email protected]

Disclaimer: Video interviews and other video content published by InvestorNews.com are produced as part of paid media services. The issuer or company featured in this video interview has compensated InvestorNews for the creation and publication of such content. The views expressed in these interviews are those of the interviewees or guests and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of InvestorNews, its writers, or its affiliates. All InvestorNews advertisers are publicly disclosed and listed on the InvestorNews Members page of InvestorNews.com. For full details, please refer to our complete disclaimer at investornews.com/disclaimer or e-mail [email protected] for further information.

5 responses

  1. Simon Strauss Avatar
    Simon Strauss

    Nothing in the global data supports the idea that “the age of the EV” is over elsewhere. China has already pushed EVs into the mid‑market; plug‑ins account for a very large share of new vehicle sales and are on track to be the dominant drive‑train. Europe has wobbled but still maintains binding climate and vehicle standards that push steadily toward high EV penetration in the 2030s.

    The United States, in other words, is increasingly the outlier.

    China
    2024 EV sales: about 11.3 million plug‑ins (BEV + PHEV), versus 1.5 million in the US.
    2024 global share: roughly two‑thirds of world EV sales (about 65%).
    Market share: in 2024, EVs were around 38–40% of new light‑vehicle sales; projections for 2030 cluster around 70–80% plug‑in share.

    Europe (overall) and key countries
    Europe as a whole had about 3 million plug‑in sales in 2024, roughly 17% of global EV sales.
    EV share of new car sales in Europe was about 23% in 2024 (BEV ~15%, PHEV ~8%), after a policy‑driven wobble but still on an upward trend.

    Selected countries (2024):
    Norway: BEV share around 80–85% of new sales; plug‑ins over 90%.
    Sweden: EV share about 60–65% of new sales (BEV + PHEV).
    Netherlands: EV share around 35–40% of new sales.
    Germany: 2024 EV sales ~570,000 units; EV share about 20–22%.
    UK: 2024 EV sales ~550,000 units; EV share just above 20%.
    France: 2024 EV sales ~451,000 units; EV share about 20%.

    United States and Canada (for contrast)
    US 2024 EV sales: around 1.5 million (1.2M BEV, 0.32M PHEV).

    US share of global EV sales: about 7% (versus China’s ~65% and Europe’s ~17%).

    US EV market share: roughly 9–10% of new light‑vehicle sales in 2024, with growth clearly slowing.

    Canada: ~252,000 EV sales in 2024; EV share around 19–20% of new sales, noticeably higher than the US.

    Other notable markets
    India: about 92,000 EVs in 2024; still low share (~2% of new sales) but growing over 60% year‑on‑year.

    Southeast Asia: EVs ~9% of new car sales in 2024, with higher shares in Thailand and Vietnam.

    Brazil: about 125,000 EVs sold in 2024; early but accelerating.

    Australia: about 112,000 EVs in 2024; EV share ~10–12% of new sales, now above the US and rising quickly.

    Global picture
    2024 global EV sales: roughly 17 million (all plug‑ins); 2025 expected around 22 million.

    Global EV share of new light‑vehicle sales: about 18–20% in 2024, heading toward ~30% by 2030 in conservative scenarios, higher in accelerated ones.

    So Jack while you can reasonably argue that “the age of the EV in North America” is politically constrained and may plateau at a lower share than once hoped, the numbers from China, Europe and a growing list of smaller markets show EVs entrenched as a core, fast‑growing part of the global light‑vehicle system rather than a fading fad.

    The United States is drifting into an increasingly uncomfortable position in the global energy and climate landscape. In 2025 it remains the world’s second‑largest emitter in absolute terms, the highest per‑capita major emitter, and it is now backsliding on climate policy just as many others, however imperfectly, are still trying to move forward.

    If these trends persist, the US risks becoming the “poor cousin” of the low‑carbon world: a wealthy country with a high‑emission lifestyle, a loud political hostility to clean energy, and a rising share of global warming that will attract sustained criticism.

  2. Jack Lifton Avatar
    Jack Lifton

    Your last paragraph describes China today and India tomorrow. There is no climate crisis. Nor has there ever been one. Economic common sense is prevailing in the United States. Other nations will follow. Our culture is built on affordable energy, not financial manipulators’ greed.

  3. Gerald Avatar
    Gerald

    Global warming/climate change and the role/need for electric vehicles need to be decoupled in order to arrive at a sensible decision concerning the future demand for REM. The EM market is a function of urban population/expense as well as a final populace understanding of the ‘system’ expense associated with EV use, i.e., tire replacement rate, road repair, Gov subsidies.

  4. Rare Earths Investor Avatar
    Rare Earths Investor

    Thanks for the article. Nice to see a counterbalance to all the hype that has flowed through the RE sector in 2025 and prior. We have seen the market impact of such unbridled positivity in the media, led by RE wannabees, ‘experts’, buy-side analysts, AI generators, and others, and their claims about future sector development, especially in connection with several strategic macro and micro events this decade. We can go back to 2010 as well as the more recent 2022 and 2025 for examples of sp herd momentum-driven charges in response to sector events, that were then followed by equal sp implosions.
    We agree there is much smoke and mirrors out there in the niche RE sector again this decade with claims for the future impact of the likes of RE finds/projections in Ukraine, Afghanistan (several stans), Turkey, Greenland, and we would put the seabed in there as well (although Mr. Lifton has a different point of view here).
    Yes, EVs, wind turbines are here to stay but the large US consumer market (and Trump political stance) has, IOHO, put a drag on RE future claims here (we will see what robotics, drones, etc., have in terms of future RE needs).
    Overall, the article supports us in our belief that the majority of the RE ROW mining projects out there will not see the light of day and that RE retail investor value lies within processing, metals and magnet (recycling) wannabees. However, likewise, here a number of these wannabes will be shown to be kings without clothing this decade, as their claims for MOUs, LOIs and offtakes, etc are debunked. Even those wannabees that demonstrate themselves to be actual RE sector prime movers over the next 3 years (gobbling up the limited offtakes available) will need to be nimble and adaptable as the RE sector is impacted by the likes of recycling, alternative methods/components, and political machinations related to the environment and voter base, etc.
    GLTA – REI

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *