The Critical Minerals Sourcing and Pricing Credibility Crisis is Upon Us

,

One would think that we had learned our lesson from the rare earth crisis of 2010-12, and, more recently, the lithium supply crisis, which may have not yet run its course.

Both crises were created when global supply exceeded global demand, but both were also framed with a false hypothesis: that the demand was, in fact, global.

The demand for both came overwhelmingly from China. Chinese domestic needs, when subtracted from “global demand,” and the fact that China’s domestic capability and capacity for processing both rare earths and lithium into end-user-friendly forms constitutes more than 80% of such capability and capacity in the world, created a crisis of supply for the rest of the world, the ROTW.  

The market mavens were actually betting on the Chinese raising the prices of both since only they could maintain prices, as their massive production of each was the basis of contractual world pricing.

The fiction that the non-Chinese commodity trading community uses is that their own (opaquely determined) stated pricing is the right price for the rare earths and for lithium.

There is, however, no Commodity Exchange guaranteeing a price for any rare earths by maintaining a physical stock and guaranteeing with it both the agreed price and agreed volume delivery among members. The LME pretends to trade lithium, but no one I know would depend on that exchange to guarantee price, volume, on-time delivery, or specification. This last requirement, specification of exchange-listed product, is the problem with both the rare earth and lithium.

The Chinese, far and away, the world’s largest producers, refiners, and users of REEs and lithum, set the prices and now the specifications to be used in the pricing of those scarce materials.

Now that the USA finally has a rare earth processing company with a long history as a mining company, we will finally be able to discover the price of rare earths produced outside of China.

Interestingly, Energy Fuels Inc. (NYSE American: UUUU | TSX: EFR is the only domestic American miner/refiner of rare earths not seeking subsidies for its products.

Interestingly also, in a recent “coverage” of the RE space that was forwarded to me — this research report wildly overestimated the cost of producing one kg of NdPr by Energy Fuels, even though the company has published its cost figures openly.

I believe that manufacturing rare earth permanent magnets (REPMs) domestically in the USA does not need subsidies to compete with the Chinese and Japanese. It needs competent and credible experienced miners, refiners, scientists, chemical engineers, and manufacturing engineers. The US Federal and State governments and their critical minerals “experts,” by their inaction and talk, show subject matter illiteracy about the REPM supply chain that is sadly common today.

All these entities, governments, and institutional investors need to speak with experienced, successful business managers with the relevant knowledge.

How are they to be found?

Just ask the Critical Minerals Institute (CMI).

Disclaimer: The author of this Investor.News post, which is published by InvestorNews Inc., may or may not be a shareholder of any of the companies mentioned in this column. No company mentioned has sponsored or paid for this content on Investor.News, and InvestorNews Inc. does not accept opt-in payments from advertisers. While InvestorNews Inc. provides digital media services like video interviews and podcasts to advertisers, not all are paid promotions. Any sponsored video interview will be clearly marked in the summary. The author of this piece is not a licensed investment advisor and makes no recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any securities. If the author holds an investment advisor license, this will be stated in their biography. Conduct your own due diligence by reviewing public documents of any company. For our full legal notices and disclaimers, click here click here.

4 responses

  1. Tracy Hughes Avatar
    Tracy Hughes

    The research report you reference Jack is — as many of the ones I read/review regularly, written by professionals with no experience in the industry. The overall practice of research reports is a fascinating one, and IF the Analyst is any good, rarely stays at the firm. I have a lot of time for a good analyst…

    The pricing crisis is part of the formula we will be reviewing in the overall Critical Minerals crisis at the CMI Summit III in Toronto.

  2. A. Neill Avatar
    A. Neill

    2010-2012 was not a demand/supply issue. It came as a result of China installing export tariffs, which the WTO deemed against their regulations. Plus they issued export quotas to a select few companies . This led to other companies having to buy quotas which shot up over $100/kg which was independent of the element. That is why cerium went to about $120-150/kg from $5. Also there is as the Japan/China maritime issue which impacted prices.

    1. Jack Lifton Avatar
      Jack Lifton

      You just proved my point. The demand supply issue was overwhelmingly in the Chinese domestic market as the 29 legal exporters fought over supplies.

  3. Rare Earths Investor Avatar
    Rare Earths Investor

    “Now that the USA finally has a rare earth processing company with a long history as a mining company, we will finally be able to discover the price of rare earths produced outside of China”.

    Do we think that the ESG compliance issue for potential ROW value chain admittance/OEM offtake acceptance is going to impact future RE prices (even consumer market product access)?

    GLTA – REI

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *