World Renowned Critical Minerals Expert Jack Lifton Says There Are No Rare Earth Deposits in the Ukraine

,

February 27, 2025 — In a recent interview with Investor.News, Jack Lifton, Co-Chair of the Critical Minerals Institute (CMI), discussed the improbability and inefficacy of developing rare earth resources in Ukraine, emphasizing the lack of viable rare earth deposits and the implausibility of making a profitable business case. Lifton stated, “Ukraine does not have any rare earth theme deposits that I’m aware of…It’s just a waste to do that,” highlighting the non-existence of economically recoverable rare earth elements within Ukrainian sovereign territory. He compared this to places like Inner Mongolia, where rare earths are a byproduct of substantial iron ore mining, contributing significantly to China’s status as a major producer of both steel and rare earth elements.

Lifton also elaborated on the geopolitical aspects of the proposed U.S. involvement in Ukrainian mining operations, suggesting that the true intent might be to embed an American economic presence as a deterrent to foreign interference, particularly from Russia. He critically noted, “What I think Trump wants to do is make the entire world into a commercial operation benefiting the United States.” Lifton dismissed the practicality of investing in Ukrainian rare earth mining as a diversion from more promising opportunities in regions like Canada and Australia, which not only have significant rare earth deposits but also established markets. He underscored the abundance of critical mineral resources in North America, particularly in Canada, advocating for enhanced U.S.-Canada cooperation in developing these assets rather than focusing on geopolitically complicated and economically unviable projects like those proposed in Ukraine.

To access the complete interview, click here

Disclaimer: The author of this post may or may not be a shareholder of any of the companies mentioned in this column. None of the companies discussed in the above feature have paid for this content. The writer of this article/post/column/opinion is not an investment advisor, and is neither licensed to nor is making any buy or sell recommendations. For more information about this or any other company, please review their public documents to conduct your own due diligence. To access the InvestorIntel.com disclaimer and other important legal notices, click here.

3 responses

  1. Rob Avatar
    Rob

    Informative and enlightening as always.
    Jack, what’s the name of that U.S. company you talked about that would have the worlds largest monazite deposits who are working in Brazil and Australia?

  2. Jack Lifton Avatar
    Jack Lifton

    Energy Fuels (UUUU:NYSE)

  3. Dan Harrison Avatar
    Dan Harrison

    > U.S. involvement in Ukrainian mining operations, suggesting that the true intent might be to embed an American economic presence as a deterrent to foreign interference…

    I agree, this may be Trump playing 5 dimensional chess, where getting from Zelensky is simply tying him up with some agreement {i.e., keeping other players like EU out of the picture } . So perhaps getting paid with future mineral resources is not the object at all.

    Also, what if the Security agreement is structured that if there is peace, then minimal armaments may be needed (saving the US a lot of money). But Ukraine is still obligated remuneration to US, then can that include Steel, Aluminum (which have strategic mineral by-products {scandium,RE, Argon gas[gas byproduct from Steel production] for ASML lithography ], etc.}
    Dan

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *