World Renowned Critical Minerals Expert Jack Lifton Says There Are No Rare Earth Deposits in the Ukraine

,

March 3, 2025 — In a recent interview with Investor.News, Jack Lifton, Co-Chair of the Critical Minerals Institute (CMI), discussed the improbability and inefficacy of developing rare earth resources in Ukraine, emphasizing the lack of viable rare earth deposits and the implausibility of making a profitable business case. Lifton stated, “Ukraine does not have any rare earth theme deposits that I’m aware of…It’s just a waste to do that,” highlighting the non-existence of economically recoverable rare earth elements within Ukrainian sovereign territory. He compared this to places like Inner Mongolia, where rare earths are a byproduct of substantial iron ore mining, contributing significantly to China’s status as a major producer of both steel and rare earth elements.

Lifton also elaborated on the geopolitical aspects of the proposed U.S. involvement in Ukrainian mining operations, suggesting that the true intent might be to embed an American economic presence as a deterrent to foreign interference, particularly from Russia. He critically noted, “What I think Trump wants to do is make the entire world into a commercial operation benefiting the United States.” Lifton dismissed the practicality of investing in Ukrainian rare earth mining as a diversion from more promising opportunities in regions like Canada and Australia, which not only have significant rare earth deposits but also established markets. He underscored the abundance of critical mineral resources in North America, particularly in Canada, advocating for enhanced U.S.-Canada cooperation in developing these assets rather than focusing on geopolitically complicated and economically unviable projects like those proposed in Ukraine.

To access the complete interview, click here

Disclaimer: The author of this post may or may not be a shareholder of any of the companies mentioned in this column. None of the companies discussed in the above feature have paid for this content. The writer of this article/post/column/opinion is not an investment advisor, and is neither licensed to nor is making any buy or sell recommendations. For more information about this or any other company, please review their public documents to conduct your own due diligence. To access the InvestorIntel.com disclaimer and other important legal notices, click here.

8 responses

  1. Rob Avatar
    Rob

    Informative and enlightening as always.
    Jack, what’s the name of that U.S. company you talked about that would have the worlds largest monazite deposits who are working in Brazil and Australia?

  2. Jack Lifton Avatar
    Jack Lifton

    Energy Fuels (UUUU:NYSE)

    1. Tracy Hughes Avatar
      Tracy Hughes

      What about Meteoric Resources Jack?

      1. Rare Earths Investor Avatar
        Rare Earths Investor

        MR is working in Brazil but unsure about any involvement in an AUS project?

        The RE wannabee has potential strategic backing from the former Biden Admin’. However, the big question is whether the Trump Admin’ will even follow through to bind anything ‘Biden’. Then we have the issue of how Trump views the Brazilian gov’ of which he has not been enamored. Further, whether the Trump Admin’s interest in Greenland, Ukraine (even Russian?) niche RE assets leads to a delay in the present Admin’ support for Biden-focused non-binding strategic money into the likes of ARR, ASM and Meteoric.

        All these RE wannabees including the likes of Lynas (CEO – ‘Mr President we have the REs the world needs, please’!) face a lot of questions in this geopolitical-focused world. JOHO – GLTA REI

  3. Dan Harrison Avatar
    Dan Harrison

    > U.S. involvement in Ukrainian mining operations, suggesting that the true intent might be to embed an American economic presence as a deterrent to foreign interference…

    I agree, this may be Trump playing 5 dimensional chess, where getting from Zelensky is simply tying him up with some agreement {i.e., keeping other players like EU out of the picture } . So perhaps getting paid with future mineral resources is not the object at all.

    Also, what if the Security agreement is structured that if there is peace, then minimal armaments may be needed (saving the US a lot of money). But Ukraine is still obligated remuneration to US, then can that include Steel, Aluminum (which have strategic mineral by-products {scandium,RE, Argon gas[gas byproduct from Steel production] for ASML lithography ], etc.}
    Dan

  4. Maplelegion Avatar
    Maplelegion

    Tracy mentions Austalian based but Brazilian Project Meteoric , Jack .
    Also worth you having a look at Noveon Magnetics , in the USA ‘
    News — Noveon Magnetics
    Noveon has emerging ties with Aussie ASM ( Australian Strategic Materials ) ..
    Maybe this new US Administration , is about to get a darn side more serious about putting some substance into the rare earths (lack of ) manufacturing capabilities ??!!

  5. Simon Avatar
    Simon

    Thank you for the thought provoking article. I’d like to suggest that Australia does have markets for its metalised Rare Earths. Rare earth mining companies in Australia like Lynas Corporation (LYC) and Australian Strategic Materials (ASM) have several potential markets and uses for their metallized rare earth materials:

    Export markets – Major manufacturing hubs in Asia (particularly Japan, South Korea, and increasingly India) are key destinations as these countries seek to reduce reliance on Chinese supply chains.

    Domestic advanced manufacturing – Australia is working to develop domestic manufacturing capabilities for rare earth magnets and other high-value components.
    Defense industry applications – Rare earths are critical for defense technologies including guidance systems, radar, and electronic warfare equipment and are eagerly sought after especially from a country that respects the “rule of law”.
    EV and renewable energy sectors – Permanent magnets using rare earths are essential components in electric vehicles and wind turbines.
    Electronics manufacturing – Companies producing consumer electronics, medical equipment, and industrial machinery require these materials.

    The specific downstream pathways depend on each company’s vertically integrated operations:

    Lynas currently processes most materials at its Malaysian facility with plans for expanded processing in Australia, and has established supply agreements with Japanese companies and the US Department of Defense.

    ASM has developed an integrated “mine to metal” approach with its Korean Metals Plant to produce high-purity metals and alloys for direct use in manufacturing.

    Both companies are positioning themselves in strategic supply chains that bypass Chinese dominance in rare earth processing, particularly as Western nations and their allies seek more secure supply arrangements for these critical materials.

  6. Matt Landry Avatar
    Matt Landry

    Thanks for this article, do you believe there is a good chance of developing a business case for Ramaco Resources’ mine in Wyoming that seems to have rare earths?

    Thanks again

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *