Critical Minerals “rightsizing” in reaction to governments’ efforts to regulate market


The past week has been pivotal for the critical minerals industry, marked by a notable adjustment in the market for electric vehicle (EV) materials. Jack Lifton, Co-Chairman of the Critical Minerals Institute (CMI), offers a perspective that contrasts sharply with the more alarmist tones often found in media coverage of this sector. According to Lifton, the recent downturn in prices for key EV component materials, such as those for batteries and magnets, should not be misconstrued as a disaster. Instead, it’s a natural market correction, or “rightsizing,” where supply and demand are finding their equilibrium without the heavy hand of regulatory intervention attempting to influence market outcomes. This view is particularly poignant as it reflects on Western governments’ efforts to regulate the market, which Lifton suggests are largely ineffective in a true market economy driven by supply and demand dynamics.

Recent financial reports from industry leaders like China Northern Rare Earth have underscored this point, revealing a 60% drop in profits due to declining rare earth element prices. This trend is not indicative of strategic market manipulation but rather a response to an overestimated demand for EVs, as evidenced by falling EV sales in significant markets such as California. This recalibration is further exacerbated by the economic climate in America and Europe, where high interest rates have cooled consumer enthusiasm for major purchases, including EVs.

Despite these challenges, opportunities abound for discerning investors. Lifton advises that only the most efficient, low-cost producers of EV materials are likely to thrive under these conditions. Companies that can maintain profitability despite falling prices, particularly those in the neodymium sector, represent promising investment targets. This approach emphasizes the importance of due diligence, encouraging investors to closely examine the fundamentals of these companies, especially their production costs relative to current market prices.

The January 2024 CMI Report further contextualizes these market dynamics, highlighting the U.S. government’s move to ban Pentagon battery purchases from major Chinese companies starting October 2027. This development, alongside global macroeconomic trends and specific updates in the EV sector, paints a picture of a market at a critical juncture. Despite the gloom surrounding EV and battery metals, with depressed prices and surplus inventory, the report suggests a stabilization in lithium prices and potential for recovery in demand and pricing in the coming months.

Recent news from Lynas Rare Earths adds another layer to this complex scenario. The company reported a significant drop in revenue, attributed to falling prices and reduced demand from China. This situation reflects broader market trends but also highlights Lynas’ strategic moves to expand capacity and improve efficiency, suggesting a long-term view towards meeting future demand.

In conclusion, the narrative emerging from Jack Lifton’s insights, the CMI report, and the latest developments from companies like Lynas offers a multifaceted view of the critical minerals and EV materials market. While the short-term outlook may appear daunting, with price declines and demand uncertainties, the underlying message is one of resilience and strategic adaptation. For investors and industry stakeholders, the current market dynamics underscore the importance of efficiency, cost management, and the ability to anticipate and respond to evolving demand patterns. As the market continues to adjust, those who remain informed and agile are likely to navigate these shifts successfully, positioning themselves for growth as the sector evolves.

Disclaimer: The author of this Investor.News post, which is published by InvestorNews Inc., may or may not be a shareholder of any of the companies mentioned in this column. No company mentioned has sponsored or paid for this content on Investor.News, and InvestorNews Inc. does not accept opt-in payments from advertisers. While InvestorNews Inc. provides digital media services like video interviews and podcasts to advertisers, not all are paid promotions. Any sponsored video interview will be clearly marked in the summary. The author of this piece is not a licensed investment advisor and makes no recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any securities. If the author holds an investment advisor license, this will be stated in their biography. Conduct your own due diligence by reviewing public documents of any company. For our full legal notices and disclaimers, click here click here.

One response

  1. Rare Earths Investor Avatar
    Rare Earths Investor

    “rightsizing,”’ – Analyst data based projections meeting the ongoing reality of consumer desires, economic impacts and (geo)political events, etc. Numbers projected out to 2035 – 50 – really?

    Lets see in last 5 years we’ve had Covid, Vaccines, Supply Chains, Immigration, Ukraine/Russia, EU fossil supply 180, Israel/Gaza, Yemen/Red Sea, etc.

    Yep, guess all those were foreseen events and factored into pre 2019 analyst projections. Now lets see in terms of RE we have developing alternative mining/processing, component switching, reductions, substitutions in, as well as recycling, etc.

    IMHO, analysts are going to see a lot more “rightsizing” in RE just in this decade alone. RE retail investors need to be very wary.

    Thanks for the perspective.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *